Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case

The Supreme Court has adjourned the bail pleas of activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, among others, involved in the conspiracy linked to the 2020 Delhi riots.

Why This Matters

This case touches on vital issues of civil rights, communal tensions, and political protests, resonating deeply with public interest and social media discussions.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public opinion is sharply divided over the Supreme Court's decision on the bail pleas of activists linked to the Delhi riots. A significant portion of comments express strong support for the judiciary, labeling the activists as threats to national integrity, while many others express outrage at perceived judicial bias, especially against minorities and the prolonged detention without trial of specific individuals. There is a pervasive sentiment of frustration regarding the justice system's treatment of communal issues, contributing to a negative perception of the judiciary's integrity.

Highlighted Comments

Shame on Indian Judiciary

Good decision by court ..

Judiciary is most corrupt

I don't agree with Umar Khalid views, but putting him in jail without trial is beyond absurd.

Justice delayed is justice denied. I celebrate your freedom. BUT THE FIGHT MUST CONTINUE.

Parties Involved

  • Supreme Court of India
  • Activists (Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam)
  • Government of India

What the people want

Supreme Court of India: Restore faith in the justice system by ensuring fair trials for all individuals regardless of their identity.

Activists: Continue advocating for civil rights and due process, as public support for your plight is growing.

Government of India: Address the public's frustrations regarding communal tensions and judicial bias to prevent further civil unrest.